SV: [AT] Tractors/acre

[Kessen, Mattias (Road SE)]

Then you could get some and fill that wagon.

/Mattias

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Rob Gray [mailto:robgray at epix.net]
Skickat: den 25 mars 2004 14:46
Till: Antique tractor email discussion group
Ämne: Re: [AT] Tractors/acre


Unfortunately, one of my tractors is a Cub ('48)... :(    Actually, it 
is not too bad of a little tractor, but I don't have any implements for 
it....

Kiser, Rick wrote:

>You could put a tractor on the wagon, maybe 2 if you had a couple of
>*%^&$* Cubs...  <grin>
>
>
>RickinNW-WA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob Gray [mailto:robgray at epix.net] 
>Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 5:12 AM
>To: Antique tractor email discussion group
>Subject: Re: [AT] Tractors/acre
>
>I'd like to have more tractors but my shed only will hold two given that
>
>I also have a wagon taking up the third bay. Don't want to store one out
>
>in the weather. Guess I need to add on to the shed one of these days....
>
>SEITHR at denison.edu wrote:
>
>  
>
>>One Farmall Cub on a 30 x 60 city lot works out to more than 22
>>    
>>
>tractors per 
>  
>
>>acre.
>>
>>I'm Bob Seith, and I approve of this message.
>>
>>From:	IN%"at at lists.antique-tractor.com"  "Antique tractor email
>>    
>>
>discussion group" 27-MAR-2004 00:19:18.35
>  
>
>>To:	IN%"at at lists.antique-tractor.com"
>>CC:	
>>Subj:	[AT] Tractors/acre
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AT mailing list
>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>_______________________________________________
>AT mailing list
>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at