[AT] OT-seeking info/Thanks

[CEE VILL]

Ivan,

I had that same thought roll around in my mind for a while today.  Good to 
know someone has actually done it. I guess at this point, that will be plan 
"B". I stopped at the dealers on the way home and picked up a new quick 
disconnect coupling for $7.00 plus change.  If that fixes the leak, not too 
bad and probably the easy way out.  My guess is that there is a 50% chance 
the leak is in  the tube, but time will tell.  The tube/hose combo looks 
like a lot more than a $7 item.  If the coupler doesn't do the trick, plan 
"B" will kick in.

Thanks for the help.

Charlie V.


>From: "Ivan Cousins" <ivancou at usachoice.net>
>Reply-To: Antique tractor email discussion group 
><at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>Subject: Re: [AT] OT-seeking info/Thanks
>Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:56:19 -0500
>
>Charlie , Doug is right , but I'll add one more thing . Throw the D*** 
>thing
>away and get a regular pipe nipple and a chunk of hose .   I have two of 
>the
>same truck , rebuilt both motors . Snapped them off trying to remove the 
>old
>ones . New GM replacements leaked too ! They all went in the trash ,
>including the one on the back of the intake manifold .     End of problem  
>.
>Ivan
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AT mailing list
>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/