[AT] New family member... thanks, Spencer

Clint D driggars at earthlink.net
Sun Mar 7 21:10:54 PST 2004


Spencer

Thanks for upgrading the site and the effort you have put into it

To me the new site is better, seems faster to me, and just cleaner acting

Thanks

Clint

----- Original Message -----
From: "Spencer Yost" <Spencer.Yost at piedmontsystems.com>
To: <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:24 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [AT] New family member... thanks, Spencer


> I have been watching and reading all of this and I don't know what to say
other than to say "Thanks for the overwhelming show of support".   To the
few detractors, all I can say I have offered to run full timing tests for
anyone that wants.   So far only two complaints of longer service have come
across my email and both are from AOL users.   I also don't see anything out
of the ordinary in the system logs.   Not to say that some folks may not see
a delay from time to time but there there is no big huge glaring problem.
>
> Three things for everyone to consider:
>
> 1 - YES, I do care for the people who claim I don't.
> 2 - The new messages come out with a Precedence header of "list".   ISPs
can and sometimes do, specifically and purposely delay the delivery of these
messages until their mail servers are less busy to deliver these messages.
The larger the ISP. the more likely you are do see differences in delivery
based on "Precedence" header.  The technical information is after my
signature.
> 3 - The _vast_ majority of people have seen service improve or at least
stay consistent with the old list.
>
> I hope this helps,
>
>
> Spencer
>
> 14.4 Precedence
>
> The precedence of a mail message determines its position among other
messages in the queue when the queue is processed. Precedence, as a header
line, also defines whether or not a bounced message should be returned to
the sender.
>
> There are only five possibilities for name that are legal:
>
> special-delivery This mail message needs to be processed before any
others. This precedence is effective only when the message is being
delivered from the queue.
>
> first-class Unless otherwise declared with a Precedence: header, the
message is first-class by default.
>
> list The message originated as part of a mailing list. It should be
deferred until other more important mail has been processed from the queue.
>
> bulk The message is a broadcast, like a mailing list but less important.
If the message can't be delivered, the message body is discarded from the
bounced mail.
>
> junk Absolutely worthless mail. Test messages and mail from some programs
fall into this category. Like bulk, the message body is discarded from the
bounced mail.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at




More information about the AT mailing list