[AT] New family member... thanks, Spencer

[Gilbert Schwartz]

Charlie; It seemed he always had something to say, about any subject being
discussed. His responses/questions seemed to come from all different angles
and always seemed to be baited. Kind of like he was just waiting for an
argument or a scrap. So different from near everyone else here. There seemed
to be NO open mind at all.
Gil
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "charlie hill" <chill8 at cox.net>
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [AT] New family member... thanks, Spencer


> Did you guys think it was a bit funny that a few weeks ago Walt couldn't
> figure out how to turn off his HTML because he was a novice computer user
> but then last night he owned the first computer on the planet and knew
more
> about it than Spencer?
>
> Charlie
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tim Bivens" <bivenshill at yahoo.com>
> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
<at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [AT] New family member... thanks, Spencer
>
>
> > Thanks from me too Spencer. I like the fact that it
> > doesn't allow html. That is great since that has been
> > such a bone of contention in the past. Now we don't
> > have to argue about html anymore! Of course there are
> > some old grouches that don't like this but they will
> > either have to live with it or leave.
> > Thanks again,
> > Tim Bivens
> > Glen Rose, Tex.
> >
> > --- Clint D <driggars at earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > Spencer
> > >
> > > Thanks for upgrading the site and the effort you
> > > have put into it
> > >
> > > To me the new site is better, seems faster to me,
> > > and just cleaner acting
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Clint
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Spencer Yost"
> > > <Spencer.Yost at piedmontsystems.com>
> > > To: <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:24 PM
> > > Subject: Re[2]: [AT] New family member... thanks,
> > > Spencer
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have been watching and reading all of this and I
> > > don't know what to say
> > > other than to say "Thanks for the overwhelming show
> > > of support".   To the
> > > few detractors, all I can say I have offered to run
> > > full timing tests for
> > > anyone that wants.   So far only two complaints of
> > > longer service have come
> > > across my email and both are from AOL users.   I
> > > also don't see anything out
> > > of the ordinary in the system logs.   Not to say
> > > that some folks may not see
> > > a delay from time to time but there there is no big
> > > huge glaring problem.
> > > >
> > > > Three things for everyone to consider:
> > > >
> > > > 1 - YES, I do care for the people who claim I
> > > don't.
> > > > 2 - The new messages come out with a Precedence
> > > header of "list".   ISPs
> > > can and sometimes do, specifically and purposely
> > > delay the delivery of these
> > > messages until their mail servers are less busy to
> > > deliver these messages.
> > > The larger the ISP. the more likely you are do see
> > > differences in delivery
> > > based on "Precedence" header.  The technical
> > > information is after my
> > > signature.
> > > > 3 - The _vast_ majority of people have seen
> > > service improve or at least
> > > stay consistent with the old list.
> > > >
> > > > I hope this helps,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Spencer
> > > >
> > > > 14.4 Precedence
> > > >
> > > > The precedence of a mail message determines its
> > > position among other
> > > messages in the queue when the queue is processed.
> > > Precedence, as a header
> > > line, also defines whether or not a bounced message
> > > should be returned to
> > > the sender.
> > > >
> > > > There are only five possibilities for name that
> > > are legal:
> > > >
> > > > special-delivery This mail message needs to be
> > > processed before any
> > > others. This precedence is effective only when the
> > > message is being
> > > delivered from the queue.
> > > >
> > > > first-class Unless otherwise declared with a
> > > Precedence: header, the
> > > message is first-class by default.
> > > >
> > > > list The message originated as part of a mailing
> > > list. It should be
> > > deferred until other more important mail has been
> > > processed from the queue.
> > > >
> > > > bulk The message is a broadcast, like a mailing
> > > list but less important.
> > > If the message can't be delivered, the message body
> > > is discarded from the
> > > bounced mail.
> > > >
> > > > junk Absolutely worthless mail. Test messages and
> > > mail from some programs
> > > fall into this category. Like bulk, the message body
> > > is discarded from the
> > > bounced mail.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > AT mailing list
> > > > http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AT mailing list
> > > http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster
> > http://search.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > AT mailing list
> > http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at