[AT] New family member... thanks, Spencer

[Tim Bivens]

Thanks from me too Spencer. I like the fact that it
doesn't allow html. That is great since that has been
such a bone of contention in the past. Now we don't
have to argue about html anymore! Of course there are
some old grouches that don't like this but they will
either have to live with it or leave.
Thanks again,
Tim Bivens
Glen Rose, Tex.

--- Clint D <driggars at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Spencer
> 
> Thanks for upgrading the site and the effort you
> have put into it
> 
> To me the new site is better, seems faster to me,
> and just cleaner acting
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Clint
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Spencer Yost"
> <Spencer.Yost at piedmontsystems.com>
> To: <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:24 PM
> Subject: Re[2]: [AT] New family member... thanks,
> Spencer
> 
> 
> > I have been watching and reading all of this and I
> don't know what to say
> other than to say "Thanks for the overwhelming show
> of support".   To the
> few detractors, all I can say I have offered to run
> full timing tests for
> anyone that wants.   So far only two complaints of
> longer service have come
> across my email and both are from AOL users.   I
> also don't see anything out
> of the ordinary in the system logs.   Not to say
> that some folks may not see
> a delay from time to time but there there is no big
> huge glaring problem.
> >
> > Three things for everyone to consider:
> >
> > 1 - YES, I do care for the people who claim I
> don't.
> > 2 - The new messages come out with a Precedence
> header of "list".   ISPs
> can and sometimes do, specifically and purposely
> delay the delivery of these
> messages until their mail servers are less busy to
> deliver these messages.
> The larger the ISP. the more likely you are do see
> differences in delivery
> based on "Precedence" header.  The technical
> information is after my
> signature.
> > 3 - The _vast_ majority of people have seen
> service improve or at least
> stay consistent with the old list.
> >
> > I hope this helps,
> >
> >
> > Spencer
> >
> > 14.4 Precedence
> >
> > The precedence of a mail message determines its
> position among other
> messages in the queue when the queue is processed.
> Precedence, as a header
> line, also defines whether or not a bounced message
> should be returned to
> the sender.
> >
> > There are only five possibilities for name that
> are legal:
> >
> > special-delivery This mail message needs to be
> processed before any
> others. This precedence is effective only when the
> message is being
> delivered from the queue.
> >
> > first-class Unless otherwise declared with a
> Precedence: header, the
> message is first-class by default.
> >
> > list The message originated as part of a mailing
> list. It should be
> deferred until other more important mail has been
> processed from the queue.
> >
> > bulk The message is a broadcast, like a mailing
> list but less important.
> If the message can't be delivered, the message body
> is discarded from the
> bounced mail.
> >
> > junk Absolutely worthless mail. Test messages and
> mail from some programs
> fall into this category. Like bulk, the message body
> is discarded from the
> bounced mail.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AT mailing list
> > http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com