[AT] OT: AOL

[dglass]

I don't have DSL, I have cable.  If you had one of these, why would you 
want or need AOL? Everyone I know that has it hates it.  I agree they 
have to improve to stay in business and they probably have new stuff 
that I haven't kept up with, but I don't think they have anything that 
others don't have better.
If AOL has become the best thing since sliced bread, I apologize to you 
and AOL.

DAVIESW739 at aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 6/12/2004 6:37:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
>dglass at mail.newnanutilities.org writes:
>I agree, AOL could only marginally be  considered internet.  If you like 
>AOL, that's because you have never  had a real internet system.  DSL, 
>cable, or satellite would be like  comparing a John Deere M to a D9 Cat. 
>in a earth moving contest.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------
>Gee  I hate to tell you this but you can have AOL and DSL all in one and for 
>Internet  service you can use any browser that your heart desires.  You have 
>the same  thing as cable or DSL or any of the other system and AOL on top of 
>that for very  little over the cost of AOL.  Besides the new IM system that 
>allows both  voice and video and instant sending of pictures I can't see why I 
>would go back  to the doldrums of your old DSL system.
> 
>The only reason i don't have DSL ia because of the phone company but we are  
>supposed to get it next year and I can add that to my AOL for onlt a few  
>dollars. But with AOLs new high speed system its not like the old days of  waiting 
>for the page to load..
>
>Walt Davies
>Cooper Hollow Farm
>Monmouth, OR 97361
>503 623-0460 
> 
>_______________________________________________
>AT mailing list
>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>  
>