[AT] FROM field in new software

[at at lists.antique-tractor.com]

I'm guessing it's just a configuration issue and Spencer can change it 
back to showing who the mail is from. I agree, I'll often read a 
message from a particular individual (farmer, and others) even though 
I've abandoned following the thread. Over the years I've found those 
I'm most interested in listening to and check the from as much as the 
subject.

Brad

On Feb 12, 2004, at 2:22 PM, at at lists.antique-tractor.com wrote:

> I'm running into the same thing. I have the Rules Wizard put all atis 
> email into my ATIS folder.  Not a big deal, but it was handy.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com 
> [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com]On Behalf Of 
> at at lists.antique-tractor.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:18 PM
> To: test tractor
> Subject: [AT] FROM field in new software
>
> I see the FROM field no longer helps to identify the original sender.  
> That was handy; any way to resurrect that in the configuration, 
> Spencer?
>  
> Note now that if senders don't put their e-mail address into their 
> docment somewhere, we won't know who to responded to "off list."
>  
> B²
> Bill Brueck (brick)
> Chatfield, Minnesota USA
>  
> Confusion is a higher state of knowledge than ignorance.
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.623 (20040212) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.antique-tractor.com/pipermail/at-antique-tractor.com/attachments/20040212/2d089830/attachment.bin>