[AT] FROM field in new software

[at at lists.antique-tractor.com]

Bob/all:

Wonder if it is possible that the list members name be delineated but not
their email address? At least then we would know who it was from and the
list would be harder to mine but then we would have maintain more
religiously the private email address in our private contacts list. 

Dean A. Van Peursem
Snohomish, WA 98290

CRS = Having a Photographic Memory but a shortage of unused film.

www.deerelegacy.com

http://members.cox.net/classicweb/email.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
[mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of
at at lists.antique-tractor.com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:22 PM
To: Antique tractor email discussion group; Antique tractor email discussion
group
Subject: Re: [AT] FROM field in new software

Not having the sender show in the header is definitely a problem.

The upside is that it will make it much harder for someone to mine the list 
for email addresses.  perhaps we need to think on that before we have 
Spencer set it up either way.

Guess we all need to use a signature file.


Bob
rbrooks at hbc.rr.com
Elmo 1948 Cub

At 03:43 PM 2/12/04 -0500, at at lists.antique-tractor.com wrote:
>I hadn't noticed that.  I wonder who wrote this post.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 3:22 PM
>Subject: RE: [AT] FROM field in new software
>
>
> > I'm running into the same thing. I have the Rules Wizard put all atis
>email
> > into my ATIS folder.  Not a big deal, but it was handy.
> >   -----Original Message-----
> >   From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
> > [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com]On Behalf Of
> > at at lists.antique-tractor.com
> >   Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:18 PM
> >   To: test tractor
> >   Subject: [AT] FROM field in new software
> >
> >
> >   I see the FROM field no longer helps to identify the original sender.
> > That was handy; any way to resurrect that in the configuration, Spencer?
> >
> >   Note now that if senders don't put their e-mail address into their
>docment
> > somewhere, we won't know who to responded to "off list."
> >
> >   B²
> >   Bill Brueck (brick)
> >   Chatfield, Minnesota USA
> >
> >   Confusion is a higher state of knowledge than ignorance.
> >
> >
> >   __________ NOD32 1.623 (20040212) Information __________
> >
> >   This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >   http://www.nod32.com
> >
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>----
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > AT mailing list
> > AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
> > http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AT mailing list
>AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at

Bob Brooks

rbrooks at hvc.rr.com

"It takes courage to grow up and turn out to be who you really are."
- ee cummings


_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at